|
9F
楼主 |
发表于 2013-9-29 22:46:32
|
只看该作者
哈哈。。人蠢哪有什么药医呢?学历再高,若没智慧的话,所写的文章论文简直是笑话嘛!够白痴脑残!难怪老马说,人才都在回教党啦!然而,文章论述不是重点,重点是要激起民族主义,以便族群不会把焦点放在政府无能,独立至今扶弱政策的失败,导致族群被讥笑为懒散不思进取的民族嘛!
Mask Man - The Truth of Malaysia
这实在是一篇很够力的所谓【历史考究】文章。读了之后,相信你也会觉得疯狂,甚至想吐血。
马来人是世界最古老的文明?
马来人原本是世界上智慧最高、最富裕的民族?
只是因为他们的智慧被华人侵占,财富被华人掠夺,所以才形成了今天的马来人被讥笑为懒散不思进取的民族?
Walao!这是什么立论?
发表上述【考古】论述的,是一位名叫扎哈拉苏莱曼(Zaharah Sulaiman)的学者;她是【马来西亚考古协会】Malaysia Archaeology Association的历史学家和作家。。。。果然很会仙!
凭着她这种特殊的身份,就可以生安白造的乱编故事,无中生有的凭空捏造虚假的历史,不但自爽,也给她的民族自慰!
她在一项国际研讨会上发表上述言论。她说,11世纪至18世纪这700年里,印度支那半岛,包括越南、柬埔寨、泰国,原本都是属于马来人的土地,当年的马来人拥有世界最优秀的文化、最高的智慧和最富裕的生活;但是在中国南部人民发动一项取名【南天】Nam Tien的侵略计划,将所有马来人的智慧文明摧毁,将马来人的所有财富掠夺;才造成今天马来人的学术成绩和生活品质比不上其他民族。
这个扎哈拉大概是把现场超过一千人的听众都当成蠢笨无比的傻瓜了。
既然马来人是世界上智慧最高的民族,那又有什么可能会被【智慧不够马来人高】的华人夺走了智慧?智慧是一种物品吗?智慧不是藏在脑里的吗?怎样夺走?
她还说当年马来人的财富是被华人掠夺,她是不是企图为今天国阵巫统马来人大肆掠夺非土著财富和权益寻找理由?将今天巫统马来朋党的贪婪无耻合理化?
她还说,当年英国殖民政府配合华裔和印裔作恶残害马来人,不允许马来人接受学校教育。直到1925年才允许马来人上学,但是只能读到4年纪,相反的,华人却可以念到大学。
实际上,根据历史真相是,马来民族以前根本不注重文化教育;也不知道吸收教育的重要性;直到1925年英国殖民政府看不下去了,才决定协助马来人开办国民学校。
扎哈拉甚至天马行空的幻想指出,当年英国人也在协助华人掠夺马来人的财产,过后还将这些掠夺自马来民族的金钱运往中国协助孙中山搞革命推翻清廷。
这就是巫统的教育制度所栽培出来的废柴。历史都不必考究的,所编乱编乱写就可以了,反正只要巫统主子爱听,是真是假并不重要。
各位看了这篇英文原文的摘录之后,是不是越看越想吐血?
所以当大家回想一下,所谓由一批马来历史学家编写的、充满怪诞神话的【马来纪元】是什么烂书,可想而知。
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=512255355529376&set=gm.625545500823981&type=1&ref=nf
Menarik! Orang Melayu Berasal Dari Etnik Dusun
Lihat,
Satu lagi penemuan saintifik oleh kumpulan penyelidik forensik dan antropologi USM diketuai oleh Dr. Zafarina Zainudin.
Orang Melayu Semenanjung Berasal Dari DUSUN.
ARTIKEL:
Dr Zafarina studies on genetics showed Malay people migrated from Borneo to Sumatera and then to Peninsula Malaysia. I have attached part of her writings below.
“TRACING THE ORIGIN OF THE MALAY RACE THROUGH THE MORPHOLOGICAL, HISTORICAL, SOCIO-CULTURAL AND GENETIC ANALYSIS
RESEARCH CENTER :
Human Genome Center , School of Health Sciences and Dental School , USM
CURRENT STATUS OF PROJECT: Ongoing ( started : Jan 2005 )
RESEARCHERS:
Principle Investigator: Dr. Zafarina Zainuddin
Co-researchers: Dr. Zilfalil Alwi, Prof. Abd. Rani Samsudin, Miss Azlina Ahmad,
Dr. Bakiah Shaharuddin, Dr. Liza Sharmini Ahmad Tajudin, Mr.
Hoh Boon Peng, Mr. Mohamad Ros Sidek, Dr. Nizam Abdullah,
Prof. Norazmi Mohd. Nor, Assoc. Prof. Ooi Keat Gin,
Panneerchelvam, Dr. Zainul Ahmad Rajion, Prof. Zainul
F.Zainuddin
INTRODUCTION:
The Malay race inhabits particularly Peninsular Malaysia and portions of adjacent islands of Southeast Asia (SEA), east coast of Sumatra , coast of Borneo and smaller islands between these areas.
They were traced by anthropological evidence from the north-western part of Yunnan , in China .
The proto-Malays were seafaring people, probably from coastal Borneo who expanded into Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia as a result of trading and seafaring activities.
The present day Malays, called Modern Malays of Peninsular Malaysia and coast of the Malay Archipelago are a mixture of different races.
They were described as deutero-Malays, descendants of the proto-Malays mixed with modern Indians, Thai, Arab and Chinese.
The history and the origin of the Malay race have been the subject of much speculation among scholars.
Since the Malays primarily reside within SEA, particularly Peninsular Malaysia, the prehistoric migrations into these regions must be taken into consideration.
Several hypotheses of the SEA migration pattern have been put forward. Preliminary studies using mitochondrial DNA analyses suggested affinity of the Southern Mongoloid in the Modern Malay population of Peninsular Malaysia (Zafarina, 2004).
The term Melayu or Malay‚ was also associated with the Hindu-Buddhist Srivijaya Empire (7th-13 centuries CE) believed to be located in the South-eastern part of Sumatra .
An Arab text dating around 1000 CE observed that travellers bound for China sailed through the sea of Melayu‚ that can be inferred to mean the Straits of Melaka.
On opposite shores of the Straits of Melaka by the 7th century CE or earlier, there were the domicile areas of the Malays, namely Sumatra and the Malay Peninsular.
OBJECTIVES:
1. To compile the genetic profile of the Malay race.
2. To study the history, social and anthropology of the Malay race.
3. To characterise the craniofacial, dental and ocular features of Malay race.
4. To correlate the genetic profile of the Malay race with their craniofacial, dental and
ocular characteristics.
5. To correlate the genetic profile of the Malay race with its history, social and
anthropology.
6. To trace the origin of the Malay race by using the genetic profile, anthropology,
craniofacial, dental and ocular characteristics.
METHODOLOGY:
The research encompasses four parts of studies: The Historical and Socio-cultural Analysis, the Ocular Morphology Analysis, the Craniofacial Morphology Analysis, and the last major part, the Genetic Analysis.
Various types of genetic markers are used in the study of the genetic components of the population.
These markers are autosomal and Y chromosome STR markers, mtDNA, Human Leucocytes Antigen (HLA) and lastly, the SNP genotyping which will be done using the Microarray 50K genechip system.
EXPECTED OUTCOME:
1. The tracing of the origin and the migration pattern of the Malay race.
2. Establishing USM as a part of the member of Pacific Pan-Asian SNP Initiative (PASNPI) organized by Human Genome Organization (HUGO)”
Dr Zafarina studies is one of the most cnclusive evidence of Borneo origins of the Malay race. They are not called Malay in Borneo, but Dusuns or Dayaks.
Dr Zafarina traced the genetic migration of the Dusunic speaking people of Borneo southwards in Borneo and along the way producing other tribes such as the Lun Bawangs, Bidayuhs, Ibans, etc. The Bidayuhs in turn migrated to Sulawesi and found the Bugis people. When the Dayaks or Dusun reached the southern tip of Borneo, they simply crossed over to Jawa and Sumatera.
Scientist has concluded that the Expres Train theory that the Malay race come from Taiwan were now discredited. Scientist found genes found among Polynesians (Hawaii) were not found among the indigenous Taiwanese. This shows the connection is missing.
Instead the theory goes that the Malay people who migrated from Indo China reached the coast of Borneo where the race and language of the Malayo Polynesian incubated. It was from Borneo that people migrated out to Taiwan, the Philippines and the rest of Insular Southeast Asia and the pacifics and the Indian ocean.
The proto Malays of Borneo were once great seafarers, reaching as far away land as Madagascar. Their migration led them to other Islands brought them to Sumatera, Jawa, Sulawesi, and then to the Pacifics Islands.
Incidently, the Malagasy language in Madagascar is closest to Maanyan language of Barito Kalimantan. But Manyan is closest to Dusun Witu of Barito which is alsmot 80% similar to the Dusun language of the Penampang and Papar Sabah dialect.
Dusun is about 30% similar to modern Malay. We know that modern Malay is only 30% indigenous, the rest were derived from or enriched by Sanskrit (Indian language), Arabs (during Islamic influence) and Chinese.
But the 30% indigenous are almost all similar to Dusun language in terms of sound and meanings. The followings are some Dusun/Malay similarity.
Eg mato for mata, tolingo for telinga, todung for hidung, dilah for lidah, siku for siku, longon for lengan, kulit for kulit, tonsi for isi, raha for darah, tulang for tulang, wulu for bulu, pusod for pusat, tuhat for urat, wotis for betis, etc.
Other words, kayu for kayu, watang for batang, roun for daun, bunga for bunga, tuah for buah, etc
others, wulan for bulan, watu for batu, tana for tanah, sawat for sawat (as in pesawat), osin for masin, onsom for masam, po’it for pahit, omis for manis, apui for api, matai for mati, pais for pisau, etc.
Others, iso for sa, duo for dua, apat for empat, limo for lima , onom for enam, etc.
Others, palanuk for pelanduk, buayo for buaya, lipos for lipas, tikus for tikus, tontolu for telur, ulanut for ular, etc
There are hundreds of words that form the indigenous part of the Malay language.
The dusun origins of modern Malay is something to be researched further. The dusunic speaking people are quite widespread. The Bisaya of Sarawak are dusunic people, also the dusuns of Tutung and Belait Brunei. In Barito, Kalimantan, the several dusunic speakers are related to the dusunic language.
Even the Bajau language and most visayan dialects in the Philippines can be traced to the dusunic langauge.
According to Dr Zafarina, the dusuns produce the Bajau people (interesting). This correspond with the legend among Visayans that they came from Borneo.
It is ironic that the dusuns today are not constitutional Malay though scientific evidence now showed the Borneo origins of the Malay language.
The dusuns who populated Borneo did not find great civilization in Borneo. The credit must be given to their descendents who migrated to Sumatera and eventually became Malays through intermarriage with the more culturally advance Indians to form the seeds of the melayur kingdom.
Today it is true being Malay is a pride to many Malaysians. But the Malaysian Constitutional definition does not make them racially Malays. Officially, the word Malay is a religious identity, not a racial identity.
Ironically, the only other people who defined their ethnic identity in terms of religion are the Jewish people.
Even Arabs recognize Arab Christians as Arabs. But in Malaysia, one has to be a Muslim to be a Malay.
The Malaysian constitutional definition excludes Javanese, Filipinos, and other indigenous in Southeast Asia who are malayo polynesian speakers as Malays because they do not fulfil the constitutinal definition.
The Malaysian definition of a Malay reduced the number of ethnic Malay to just 25 million people wolrd wide.
Thus, the Malay history also started only with the advent of islam in the 14th century. Malay did not exist before the advent of Islam.
The term Malay was popularized by western anthropologists based on their readings of Sejarah Melayu, however, distorted.
The term Malay is now very popular, used even by President Gloria Aroyo to identify her Filipino racial heritage. Unfortunately, may be she did not know, but the Malaysian Malays would have disputed her. She does not fulfill the Malaysian Constitutional definition to be a Malay.
Unless Malaysia change its constitution to make Malay a racial identity for Malayo Polynesian people, then the narrow definition would make the term Malay relevant to a small group of people in a sea of 300 million Austronesian Malayo Polynesian speakers.
As of now, to be a Malay is just like to be a Jew, where ethnicity is defined by religious identity.
http://duniaitu.blogspot.com/2010/04/menarik-orang-melayu-berasal-dari-etnik.html
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=607745785956883&set=gm.672273359451985&type=1&relevant_count=1&ref=nf
|
|